With more than 3,000 miles of shoreline, Maryland communities face increasing risks from sea level rise, flooding, and extreme storms. Some leaders have recognized that how local governments are organized to make decisions (i.e., their governance structures) needs to transform so that communities can effectively deliver adaptation and resilience projects to secure a future. In Maryland, we see how one state has responded by creating a new model that can work across jurisdictional boundaries to better deliver complex projects.
In May 2020, the Maryland legislature passed Senate Bill 457, authorizing local governments to create and fund Resilience Authorities. Resilience Authorities are a new governance model designed to accelerate infrastructure financing, reduce implementation costs, and address challenges working across jurisdictional boundaries. Resilience Authorities permit multiple local governments to develop collaborative methods to create infrastructure projects to address sea-level rise, flooding, increased precipitation, and erosion. Resilience Authorities are governed by Boards that bring together expertise from various sectors to identify funding and project opportunities. Resilience Authorities can also incorporate Advisory Committees that include regional partners to ensure community representation and create forums for practitioners to collaborate. See Figure 1 above, "Resilience Authorities’ Financing Mechanisms," developed by the National Academy of Public Administration.
To date, two Resilience Authorities have been created, and one is in progress. When they are created, the local governments have the flexibility to define the structure and governing body.
These Resilience Authorities have initiated projects including:
Resilience Authorities can focus on just one jurisdiction, like the Charles County Resilience Authority, or counties and municipalities can work across jurisdictional boundaries to pool expertise, resources, and diversify funding streams, as is the case for the Anne Arundel Resilience Authority. To create a variety of funding sources, Resilience Authorities are allowed to collect fees, as well as issue bonds; however, those bonds are not a pledge of the county's or city's full faith and credit or taxing power. Resilience Authorities also rely on grants and federal funding, which can be employed directly to resilience projects through these authorities.
Resilience Authorities do have several limitations. They do not have taxation authority or eminent domain power. Additionally, the reliance on federal funding has created some uncertainty over the availability of funding resources in the future. However, Resilience Authorities are allowed to work with private partners. As the examples above highlight, Resilience Authorities are exploring new partnerships with other private and public entities to continue their climate resilience work. Maryland’s experience underscores that rethinking decision-making structures is not a one-time act, but an ongoing process. As Resilience Authorities continue to evolve, the Academy’s Extreme Weather Resilience Hub will remain focused on understanding how these new institutional arrangements work on the ground.